Simulation Types
      Partial Task Trainers 
        Body parts/regions with functional anatomy to practice or evaluate particular 
        skills.   
         
        Examples: Head/airway for intubation, Chest for Central Venous Line care 
      Virtual Reality 
        Computer simulates the physical world and the user interacts within the 
        world.   
         
        Examples: Adult and (soon to be) Pediatric Advanced Life Support, Disaster 
        training 
      Haptic Systems 
        Combines a computer-generated situation (virtual) with sensory stimuli 
        (partial task trainer or mannequin) to real time track competencies and 
        give learner feedback.   
         
        Examples: Central venous line and Peripheral intravenous line insertion 
      CEM (Computer-Enhanced Mannequins) 
        Computerized full-body mannequins that can be programmed to provide realistic 
        physiologic responses to practitioners actions. Used to integrate & 
        evaluate competencies, critical thinking, and clinical judgment. The practitioner 
        must synthesize knowledge, technical and communication skills and an interdisciplinary 
        team to manage a patient with variable complexity.  Requires a realistic 
        environment and medical equipment/supplies.    
         
        Examples: Simulation infant, child and adult mannequins  
      Peer-to-Peer Learning 
        Collaboration used to develop and master specific skills used 
        to develop health and physical assessment competencies.   
         
        Examples: Listening to breath sounds, blood pressure monitoring  
      Standardized Patients 
        Case studies and role playing taught to portray and care for 
        patient.  It is used to develop communication and critical thinking 
        skills. 
         
        Examples: History and assessment of a child with pneumonia 
         
        Decker, 
        S., Sportsman, S., Puetz, L., & Billings, L. (2008).  The evolution 
        of simulation and its contribution to competency.  The Journal 
        of Continuing Education in Nursing, 39 (2), 74-80. 
      Key Principles of Educational Practice Using Simulation
      Objectives/Planning 
        The design and facilitating are the key components of a simulation. First, 
        identify objectives and be as specific as possible. Second, determine 
        the complexity of the skills developing or competency that will be measured.  
      
        -  Determine a time frame allowing at least ¼ of the 
          time for the debrief at the end of the session.
 
        -  Cues: Can be developed as an algorithm. If the learner performs 
          or asks questions correctly they move in one direction. If wrong, they 
          are asked for more information or re-direct. If the learner becomes 
          frustrated the facilitator can re-direct with cues. 
 
        - Identify participating roles, and determine what information 
          the learners will need prior to the simulation. 
 
        - Develop a scenario based on the target audience’s clinical 
          environment and the simulation available to determine the best fit for 
          their learning needs.  
 
        -  Equipment failure: Finally, know your technology by troubleshooting 
          and practicing several times before going “live”.  
        
 
       
      Facilitator Role 
        The skill of the facilitator is directly correlated to the quality of 
        the learning experience.  The facilitator must aim to guide and direct 
        as opposed to “teach”. If there is a behavioral change that 
        is to occur, it may be best to create an image of “co-learner”.  
       
      
        - Set high expectations: be clear on time frame, objectives 
          and ground rules. Ground rules include confidentiality, respect and 
          any equipment stipulations.
 
        - Support learner and empathize with the anxiety that can be 
          provoked. Gather data to discuss within the debrief.  
 
        - Discourage competition.  
 
        - Know your target group and the practice setting. Ideally 
          2 people should be in any simulation.  Complexity of the simulation 
          chosen may require it-ie; CEM.
 
       
      Learner Role  
         
        Set high expectations, but don’t compete.  Individual needs 
        to be a self-directed, motivated learner. Clarify role within simulation- 
        can be the patient, family member, video-taper, observer-everyone should 
        have an identified role prior to start.   
                     
        Debriefing 
        It is active, engaging and is structured to promote reflection. Approximately 
        ¼ of the time allotted for the simulation is recommended to be 
        dedicated to the debrief. 
       How to debrief: 
      
        -  Start with feelings. Encourage learners to express emotions related 
          to experience. This is an oOpportunity to regain trust, comfort and 
          purpose of activity.
 
          - How do you feel about (experience)?  
          - How do you think it went? 
           
         
        -  Gather feedback.
 
          What went well? 
          What was challenging? 
           
         
        -  Review the experience. Frame the learning to link to theory, content 
          or skill. Develop a common set of experiences.
 
        -  Link to future or past experiences, events to reinforce memory and 
          critical thinking.
 
        - Provide a written evaluation for the simulation activity or feedback 
          opportunity.
 
       
      Fanning, 
        M.M. & Gaba, DM. (2007).  The role of debriefing in simulation-based 
        learning. Simulation in Healthcare, 2 (10), 1-11. 
      Dreifuerst, 
        K. (2009). The essentials of debriefing in simulation learning: A 
        concept analysis. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30 (2), 109-114. 
      CHHS Simulation
      
        -  NRP
 
        - PALS
 
        - Mock codes
 
        - Trauma Room course
 
        - Competencies
 
        - Transport team competencies
 
        - When Seconds Count in RNO                
        
 
       
      Resources
      Sites Available 
      
        -  STAR lab MCW (fee charge)
 
        -  CC 4th floor CC
 
        -  2nd floor CC
 
       
      Clinicians 
      
         
          | Robyn Saxe | 
          Unit-Based APN transport simulations | 
         
         
          | Kristin (Lewis) Braun  | 
          Trauma room simulations | 
         
         
          | Karen Bauer | 
          PALS, CPR | 
         
         
          | Lynn Doyle | 
          Case-based scenarios for RRT, SBARR | 
         
         
          | Scott Hagen MD | 
          MCW Director of Pediatric Simulation | 
         
         
          |  Viday Heffner MD | 
          Emergency Medicine  | 
         
         
          | Christina Diaz  | 
          Anesthesiology | 
         
         
          | Jennifer McKanry | 
          MCW video education - CCC 4th floor  | 
         
         
          | Cecilia Lang | 
          Unit-Based APN mock codes | 
         
       
      Resources
      Best 
        Practices in Simulation Design by William Horton (PDF - March 2006) 
       
      SAEM 
        Simulation Interest Group Simulation Scenario Template (from Robyn Saxe) 
         
      Simulation-based 
        Application Training: A Case Study (PDF - December 2004)  
      Using 
        Simulation to Enhance Medical Education (MCW site)  
      Additional References
      Jeffries, 
        P. (2005). A framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating simulations 
        used as teaching strategies in nursing.  Nursing Education Perspectives, 
        26 (2), 96-103. 
      Scalese, 
        R.J., Obeso, V.T. & Issenberg, S.B. (2007).  Simulation technology 
        for skills training and competency assessment in medical education. Journal 
        of General Internal Medicine, 23 (suppl 1), 46-49. 
       |